Input
Trust and data handling
Know what to share, what stays yours, and where humans stay in control.
AI-27001 helps teams organise ISO 27001 evidence, security-review responses, controls, risks, and approval workflows. This page gives buyers a plain-English view of what data may be involved, how AI support is bounded, and what should wait for an agreed security review.
Handling principles
Conservative by design: organise evidence, keep ownership explicit, and avoid overclaiming.
- AI drafts and checks; humans approve decisions and commitments.
- Evidence workflows are designed to remain owned and exportable.
- Detailed security questions should be handled in a direct review, not guessed from public copy.
Choose your next step
Ask the security questions before sharing sensitive evidence.
Book a security walkthrough, request a free evidence-flow review with redacted context, or ask about a guided trial that starts with one reviewed workflow.
Founding customer plan starts at £300/month + VAT, with hands-on onboarding and one free evidence/admin workflow review before commitment.
Data buyers may provide
Typical inputs are compliance context and evidence-review material.
The exact data depends on the workflow you choose to review or operate. In early conversations, redacted samples and high-level context are usually enough.
Input
Policies, controls, risks, Statement of Applicability decisions, tasks, and review notes
Input
Security questionnaire, customer-assurance, audit-prep, and evidence-pack material you choose to provide
Input
Contact details and booking or lead-capture information needed to respond to your request
Choose your next step
Start with security questions, redacted evidence, or one guided workflow.
Cautious buyers can keep the first step lightweight: ask handling questions, share redacted workflow context, and decide whether a bounded evidence review or guided trial should follow.
Founding-customer conversations start cautiously: one reviewed workflow, redacted context where possible, and agreed handling before deeper evidence is shared.
Use public forms for questions and representative workflow context, not secrets or unrestricted credentials.
A guided review can focus on one evidence flow before sensitive material is shared.
AI support remains human-reviewed; AI-27001 does not replace legal, audit, risk, or compliance judgement.
Commercial next step
Choose a bounded review path before sharing sensitive evidence.
If the handling posture looks right, route into one practical workflow review. Each route starts with limited context, keeps human review explicit, and avoids asking for secrets or unrestricted access.
SaaS security reviews
Map one buyer security-review workflow
Use one current questionnaire, renewal pack, or buyer diligence request to review the evidence, owner, reviewer, and freshness gaps without sharing sensitive production data first.
Map one security-review workflowTrust-centre evidence
Trace one public claim to the proof behind it
Start with a published security promise or trust-centre answer and map the supporting controls, owners, approvals, evidence, and review dates.
Review one trust-centre evidence trailISO evidence review
Review one ISO evidence workflow safely
Bring redacted context for one audit-prep, supplier assurance, SoA, or evidence-pack workflow and decide what should be reviewed before deeper sharing.
Review one ISO evidence workflowAI support boundaries
AI assistance is bounded by human review and accountable ownership.
AI-27001 is not sold as autonomous certification, legal advice, or a guaranteed audit pass. It is workflow support for drafting, checking, organising, and explaining the compliance record.
Trust principle
Human-reviewed AI support
AI can help draft, check, summarise, and structure compliance work, but people approve wording, risk decisions, legal commitments, and the formal record.
Trust principle
Evidence stays owned by your organisation
AI-27001 is designed around named owners, review gates, exportable evidence packs, and a clear audit trail rather than opaque autonomous decisions.
Trust principle
Conservative security posture
We avoid unverified claims. Public pages describe high-level handling principles; detailed architecture, access, and contractual terms should be reviewed directly.
Before NDA or security review
Keep public-form sharing limited until the handling model is agreed.
Use the site forms to start the conversation, not to transfer sensitive production material. If a deeper review is needed, book time first so access, scope, and expectations can be agreed deliberately.
Do not overshare
Do not send production secrets, passwords, private keys, live credentials, or unrestricted API tokens through public forms.
Do not overshare
Do not upload highly sensitive customer data, regulated personal data, or confidential incident material before an agreed NDA/security review.
Do not overshare
Share representative samples, redacted evidence, workflow screenshots, or high-level context first when a lighter pre-sales review is enough.
Do not overshare
Use a booked security discussion if you need to agree handling expectations before sharing deeper evidence.
FAQ
Common security, AI, and evidence-ownership questions.
Question
Does AI-27001 use AI to make compliance decisions for us?
No. AI support is positioned for drafting, checking, organising, and reducing manual administration. Your organisation remains responsible for risk acceptance, implementation, approvals, legal review, auditor conversations, and final judgement.
Question
Who owns our evidence and outputs?
Your organisation owns the evidence, decisions, and final outputs it provides or approves. The product direction is to keep evidence structured, reviewable, and exportable so assurance work can be explained outside the platform when needed.
Question
What should we share before a formal review?
For an initial conversation, share high-level workflow context and redacted examples where possible. Avoid secrets, credentials, sensitive personal data, or confidential client material until handling requirements are agreed.
Question
Can we ask detailed security or privacy questions before booking?
Yes. Book a short walkthrough or use the free evidence review CTA and include your security/data-handling questions in the request. We will route the conversation appropriately rather than asking you to overshare in public forms.
Free review
Not ready to book? Get a practical evidence next step instead.
Pick the lower-friction option that fits where you are. We’ll use your page and campaign context to understand the request without adding tracking clutter to the visible URL.
We’ll look at one evidence flow and send practical gaps or next steps.
Security questions
Need to review handling before you share evidence?
Bring your security, privacy, AI-use, or evidence-ownership questions to a short walkthrough and we’ll keep the scope conservative until the right review path is agreed.
AI-27001 is a product of SW DIGITAL SERVICES LIMITED, registered in England and Wales. Company number 17178287.